Erik ( talk | contribs) 13:39, (UTC) Here's another good source to use: Question for Big Film: It’s Not a Comedy? Erik ( talk | contribs) 13:47, (UTC) I've revised the section using the two sources above. The section needs to be an actual summary about the film's marketing, not a timeline lined with indiscriminately described events. Erik ( talk | contribs) 13:33, (UTC) It is also worth reading Wikipedia:Proseline. I would especially encourage addressing this section before considering the article for Good Article status. It should focus primarily on commentary with select use of detail to clarify certain elements. The level of detail indicates a pre-release mentality where we know nothing, where when the film comes out (and will be in public forever), such details matter less. We need to write encyclopedic articles from a historical perspective, meaning that we have to consider the long-term viability of articles' content. This is a good source to use more, but the section is swamped with needless detail. The commentary from secondary sources is not enough to justify the amount of detail.
#FILM COWBOYS AND ALIENS TV#
A "Marketing" section should be more than just describing the contents of trailers, TV spots, radio ads, and posters.
Boycool ( talk) 20:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC) I agree that the level of detail in the "Marketing" section is indiscriminate. Describing the entirety of every trailer seems a little excessive. I realize the section is sourced, but it's poorly written. Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.0.44.144 ( talk) 03:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Marketing The official website says: "The script for Cowboys & Aliens is by Star Trek's Alex Kurtzman & Roberto Orci and Damon Lindelof (television's Lost), based on Platinum Studios' graphic novel created by Scott Mitchell Rosenberg." Wildroot ( talk) 06:04, 22 November 2010 (UTC) Firefly Xeworlebi ( talk) 19:43, 21 November 2010 (UTC) Yeah, I considered this issue.
#FILM COWBOYS AND ALIENS MOVIE#
The graphic novel is basically based on the then in limbo movie, with this movie being a new script based on the original movie concept. Is it fair to say that the movie is based on the graphic novel, just because it was released earlier? The only reason the graphic novel was made is because the movie got stuck in development. The content is identical to the synopsis on the DreamWorks site. 14 Jake's Wrist Weapon and the "Chiricahua" connection.